<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of Telephony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fttxtra.com/general/the-death-of-telephony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fttxtra.com/general/the-death-of-telephony/</link>
	<description>Broadband, Fiber, and the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:44:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Death of Telephony &#124; FTTxtra -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fttxtra.com/general/the-death-of-telephony/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Death of Telephony &#124; FTTxtra -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fttxtra.com/?p=2329#comment-184</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Bartell and John Bartell. John Bartell said: New blog post: The Death of Telephony http://bit.ly/2NkRSC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Bartell and John Bartell. John Bartell said: New blog post: The Death of Telephony <a href="http://bit.ly/2NkRSC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2NkRSC</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fttxtra.com/general/the-death-of-telephony/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fttxtra.com/?p=2329#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Agree fully with the sentiment.

But why oh why is all out regulation centred on preserving legacy voice services in their current form.

The notion of creating a national data fabric has not even eneterd our lexicon.  Ofcom favour another 4 years of call conveyance charges rather than sending a clear signal that the transfer of bits is the only valid measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree fully with the sentiment.</p>
<p>But why oh why is all out regulation centred on preserving legacy voice services in their current form.</p>
<p>The notion of creating a national data fabric has not even eneterd our lexicon.  Ofcom favour another 4 years of call conveyance charges rather than sending a clear signal that the transfer of bits is the only valid measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyberdoyle</title>
		<link>http://www.fttxtra.com/general/the-death-of-telephony/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberdoyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fttxtra.com/?p=2329#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Great article, you are spot on. 

Anyone not engaged in this way is being left behind. If more mobile masts were deployed the coverage in the UK would be a lot better and more people would use the internet more. In the same way rural areas don&#039;t have first gen copper broadband access they don&#039;t have mobile coverage in the UK either.
But, we can see the future.
It just ain&#039;t here for all of us yet.
chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, you are spot on. </p>
<p>Anyone not engaged in this way is being left behind. If more mobile masts were deployed the coverage in the UK would be a lot better and more people would use the internet more. In the same way rural areas don&#8217;t have first gen copper broadband access they don&#8217;t have mobile coverage in the UK either.<br />
But, we can see the future.<br />
It just ain&#8217;t here for all of us yet.<br />
chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
